War on Jobs Resize

Obama’s War on Alabama Jobs

coal-miner-hands

Although the Obama Administration claims it has an “all the above” energy strategy, the war on coal makes that claim dubious at best. Coal is an abundant energy source and the White House should be doing everything it can to help the energy industry compete in the global market and create new jobs, not slapping the industry with over one hundred new regulations. But, that is exactly what is happening.

Currently, the United States has about 25 percent of the entire world’s coal reserves, enough to provide America with approximately 125 years’ worth of energy at current levels. Of that figure, Alabama has over 3.1 billion tons of recoverable coal that contributes about $1 billion to the Alabama economy every year. Coal is expected to surpass oil as the world’s largest energy source by 2020.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently announced proposed rules on newly constructed coal plants and is set to announce emissions standards for already existing plants in the summer of 2014. The regulations for new coal plants are predicated on “carbon capture storage” which is a method of separating carbon dioxide (CO2) from the coal emissions and then storing the gas underground. While it may sound like a reasonable idea, the technology simply does not exist in a commercially viable manner and requires upwards of 30-40 percent of the plant’s own energy to separate and store the gas miles under the ground.

There is no doubt that continued steps to make our country more energy efficient and incorporate clean technology must be undertaken. However, even with increased population and energy consumption, these new regulations come at a time when America’s CO2 emissions from coal are currently at their lowest levels since 1988.


While the government has an interest in protecting the environment, it should not be allowed to favor one industry over another.

Unfortunately, the costs of such regulations vastly outweigh any benefits. The EPA itself estimates an insignificant 1.3% reduction in atmospheric greenhouse gas during implementation.

The aftermath of the EPA’s announcement is not surprising. The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) recently voted to close six coal-powered units in Alabama, causing hundreds of jobs to be impacted due to what the TVA called “increasingly stringent environmental regulations.”  It is estimated that hundreds more coal-fired plants across the country will shut down as a result, which is precisely what the Obama Administration wants. Interestingly, the energy companies’ proposed coal-fired plants, that likely will not be built, would have been much cleaner than their current coal-fired counterparts.  The net effect is that electricity bills will likely rise.

While the government has an interest in protecting the environment, it should not be allowed to favor one industry over another. Billions of taxpayer dollars have already been wasted on failed green companies like Solyndra while the Obama Administration has impeded the proven and economically important coal industry. If the EPA’s regulations for existing plants are implemented, the coal industry could collapse. Everyone who pays a power bill will suffer, along with hard-working Alabama miners and their families who depend on the industry for their livelihood.

Thankfully, members of Congress from coal-producing states have taken notice. Led by both Republicans and Democrats from Kentucky and West Virginia, the bipartisan Whitfield-Manchin bill would block the EPA’s regulations unless Congress later approves them. It would also set emissions limits that have been proven for at least a year at six different commercial power plants. The EPA’s regulations merely set an arbitrary number championed by organizations like the Sierra Club with little basis, or concern, for their actual achievability. Lawsuits and challenges by the states will likely come as well.

Unlike the potential effects of global warming that may not come to fruition, Obama’s war on coal kneecaps America’s ability to produce energy and will cost money, will harm the economy, and will eliminate jobs across the country and here in Alabama.

 

Brandon Demyan is policy counsel for the Alabama Policy Institute (API). API is an independent non-partisan, non-profit research and education organization dedicated to the preservation of free markets, limited government and strong families. If you would like to speak with the author, please call (205) 870-9900 or email him at brandond@alabamapolicy.org. Follow Brandon Demyan on Twitter:  @BJDemyan

                                                                                                                             

Note: This column is a copyrighted feature distributed free of charge by the Alabama Policy Institute (API). Permission to reprint in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided the author(s) and API are properly cited.

 

Tags: No tags